Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Riding the Wonderland Wave

Yes, this will be a review on the trilogy of Wonderland-inspired novels by Frank Beddor, more commonly known as "The Looking Glass Wars"!

I just finished the final book in the trilogy, Archenemy, but the previous two books have been on my shelf for years, and I fell in love with the racier, darker Wonderland in the first few paragraphs. I have to admit my bias here - I fall for anything Wonderland - I am not sure why, but psychiatrist analysis aside, I think it's mostly due to the fact that anything written in rhyme, like the original Alice in Underland, can be subject to such a myriad of interpretations and such, that it just lends itself to wonderment (no pun intended).

Since I don't think this book can be reviewed separately from the previous two - and I recommend you read them together, too - I will be reviewing all three! (Work for me, but it really is delightful! and besides, I have been neglecting this blog for too long a while) and I will include stuff I think important to understand the development of the series or the author himself - since I find him a very fascinating person and artist and I relish the opportunity to delve into his creative process a little bit.

So without further ado, my review of "The Looking Glass Wars":

Now, I will preface this with the simple fact that the original Alice in Wonderland is actually a string of nursery rhymes and sing-song sayings in the guise of a story - that is, the rhymes and logic of the stories connect in such a way that it is reminiscent of a nursery rhyme, as opposed to a story of morals for children, quite popular at the time it was written. I took a class on this in my undergrad at the University of Toronto, but basically, my professor Deirdre Baker (excellent professor and great to talk to about Children's Lit; find her here), and the idea is basically that there are two main story types of children, Moral stories and Nursery rhymes. And the older of the two is the latter, and, this is my opinion now, it is more interesting to study, since the logic of nursery rhymes is completely out of whack with reality ... usually.

That is to say, nursery rhymes follow their own logic - and in the middle of a nursery rhyme world - the logic makes sense. It is perfectly reasonable to have a race with a Dodo bird, or to have a pig baby grow in your arms at an alarming rate. Nursery logic is supposed to tip the edges of our reality and give us a peak at what could have been, should the world had been ordered differently.

They're also dark - much darker then fairy tales (moral stories) and such. I mean, think of the nursery rhymes from your childhood - "Rock-a-by-baby, on the tree's top, as the wind blows, the cradle will rock, As the cradle rocks, the bough will break, and down comes baby, cradle and all" - riiiight, infanticide in a lullaby. Nice. But it's a strange dark, isn't it? A darkness put to music and colour - something that peeks out at you and winks, like a smiling death figure.

And essentially, that is what the original Alice is.


And, I would posit, that is why there is so much revision and remaking of the story - nursery rhymes are dark, fun literary tools that are riddled (again, pun, not intended) with deeper meanings and cultural significance - that of course, change, witht he changing cultures. And that is why Alice remakes get to me, I think.

Now, for a bit of the remake history.

I want to start with the political cartoons drawn by Francis Carruthers Gould, written by "Saki" (H.H.Munro) and compiled in The Westminster Alice (1902). Basically, it is a collection of political cartoons in the style of the original John Tenniel, and it satirizes the British Government at the time and it involves Alice basically muddling her way through British Parliament, much like she did in Wonderland, trying to make sense of such a strange atmosphere and cloaked dealings. The brilliance of this parody is exactly what I meant about the adaptability of nursery rhymes and their undying presence throughout time.

The Disney take on Alice was ... okay. I will admit, that when I first saw it, I was at the stage where Alice just annoyed me with her mild mannered English cuteness and no real substance. Anyways, looking back on it now, I am annoyed for different reasons, but ultimately, I like the Disney Alice for what it is - and it stays true to those nursery rhyme roots I keep harping on about - it kind of jumps from Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass, and takes some from one, and other parts from the other, etc - and it makes sense. And I like it for that. Keep in mind it was originally conceived in the 30s and finally made it to the screen in the 50s and you get an even better cultural appreciation.

Onto my generations!

Recently, there have been a tonne of Alice adaptations and so forth - including the Beddor trilogy. For example, the Tim Burton Alice, which takes off years after the second book, Alice is in her twenties and Wonderland is a much darker place. Though this is true, Alice herself retains a lot of her Disney persona. The blonde, wide eyed, sticky British-ness. American McGee's Alice video game (besides being a brilliant video game) takes the wonderland story on its head and basically takes Alice to be mentally disturbed and homicidal - an interesting point of view in this journey that Alice has taken. Added to this, with less dark venom, is the Syfy Alice - a continuation of their great adaptations began by the really awesome Tin Man (an adaptation of another favourite of mine, The Wizard of Oz). Alice adaptations have seemed to be either modeled on the Disney version, or of a darker, edgier quality.


I must say, I am quite a fan of the darker stuff.

And here we enter the literary world.

And it is a rich, multi-tiered place where Alice references are peppered everywhere. Terms like "Down the Rabbit Hole" and "Through the Looking Glass" are common now, and most Westerners know what they mean. And literature reflects this in many ways. But adaptations of Alice (and by this I mean, with Alice herself, not another girl, or a granddaughter or a cyborg) are what really gets me going. I like the idea of ebing able to take a story - a well known story, and make it your own, so that it reflects your world.

There are a few examples of this - mostly, for some reason, in the science fiction world, and of course, then there is my favourite - The Looking Glass Wars. (Yes, this is a long winded review ...)

The premise of the books I am reproducing here from the Frank Beddor Looking Glass Wars promotional website:

The Looking Glass Wars unabashedly challenges the world’s Carrollian Wonderland assumptions of tea parties, dormice and a curious little blonde girl to reveal an epic, cross dimensional saga of love, murder, betrayal, revenge and the endless war for Imagination. Meet the heroic, passionate, monstrous, vengeful denizens of this parallel world as they battle each other with AD-52’s and orb generators, navigate the Crystal Continuum, bet on jabberwock fights and slip each other the poisonous pink mushroom. Finally, someone got it right. This ain’t no fairytale.

Alyss Heart, heir to the Wonderland throne, was forced to flee through the Pool of Tears after a bloody palace coup staged by the murderous Redd shattered her world. Lost and alone in Victorian London, Alyss is befriended by an aspiring author to whom she tells the surreal, violent, heartbreaking story of her young life only to see it published as the nonsensical children’s sojourn Alice in Wonderland. Alyss had trusted Lewis Carroll to tell the truth so that someone, somewhere would find her and bring her home.

But Carroll had got it all wrong. He even misspelled her name! If not for the intrepid Hatter Madigan, a member of the Millinery (Wonderland’s security force) who after a 13 year search eventually tracked Alyss to London, she may have become just another society woman sipping tea in a too-tight bodice instead of returning to Wonderland to battle Redd for her rightful place as the Queen of Hearts.

This is the synopsis for the first book, but for our purposes,

Basically, Wonderland has transformed into the collective imagination - the Source, as Dodgson comments in the third book, of the real world. And those in Wonderland - Wonderlanders, are caught in the dual roles as people for themselves and imaginiationists who have the responsibility of providing innovation to the real world, and Wonderland itself. And into this world is thrust a Queendom in trouble and a princess in exile, in our world.

I was not overly excited about this book initially, but my friend K, lent it to me, and by the time I saw her the next week I was salivating for the next installment (which was still a bloody year away).

The second one, Seeing Red, I devoured much like the first, though it got increasingly more complex and I realized at some point that reading the Hatter M comic addendum was probably important - and so I embarked on my study of the website which can be found here. Beddor has been criticized for many things -mostly though, that he is an enterprising artist in that he makes things for money only, not pleasure. After reviewing the website over years, I would have to disagree. Yes, he has made an empire of this, and he wants to make a movie and there's a card game and such, but to me all this says about him is his excitement over this series - and it is a great series.

It is action packed and it is sentimental, it has twists and turns and it has great fight scenes. It is complex and at times, it takes a while to get to a point you knew was coming, but it is a great read.

And here comes the actual review part of this entry: Archenemy.

Here is the synopsis of this novel:

The Heart Crystal’s power has been depleted, and Imagination along with it. The people of Wonderland have all lost their creative drive, and most alarmingly, even Queen Alyss is without her powers. There is some comfort in the fact that the vicious Redd Heart seems to be similarly disabled. Amazingly, she is attempting to team up with her enemy, Alyss, in order to reclaim Wonderland from King Arch. Alyss might have no choice but to accept Redd’s overtures, especially when she begins to receive alarming advice from the caterpillar oracles.

So, basically - Wonderland is in a huge amount of trouble - both Redd and Alyss are left without powers, and the overly misogynist King Arch of the Borderlands, is instigating a war against Wonderland.

Uh oh.

Now the narrative, as with the other two, is fast. One second you are being appraised of the situation, and the next you are on the battlefields. And that is something I appreciate. This style of writing has got a lot of flack for being too "movie like" and less literary, but I think that this type of writing fits with the overall feel of the book - which is a fast paced thriller. With tonnes of twists and intrigue.

One thing I really appreciate about Beddor's LGW trilogy (hereafter LGWT) is the strong female characters. Like, strong. Some may be evil, some may be powerless, but they are strong. Like Alyss, Queen of Wonderland - military strategist but so in command of all the other facets of her life - including the life she left behind, in our world. When she jumps through the Pool of Tears to the real world to save the Liddels from certain doom, you are left thinking she is strong but stupid, for leaving Wonderland and all her responsibilities there. But then she faces her childhood tormentor, Dodgson, and this is an excellent example of how strong she really is. And it is a great counter balance to her relationship with Dodge, childhood sweetheart and all around amazing badass.

Homburg Molly would be another such strong female character - she is lost from what she has gone through, in the previous book, and is ridden with a guilt for the events she caused to happen. But in the end, she is able to push past her own guilt and inhibitions, and get the job done. She is able to get through to the end in one piece, better then before.

And this strong female empowerment is not at the expense of the male characters, who are in themselves wonderfully expressed. Excepting Arch, who is probably the least developed character, the male characters are both sweet and complex - they get on your nerves and they also inspire you.

The plot is quick, and this is generally a criticism, but I liked it - I thought it was what was needed for the story to further itself.

Anyways, in the world that is my Book Fort, I would give this a 9/10 of Alice adaptations and a 10/10 of YA Fantasy.

Cheers! :D



Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Stalemate

Busy lives ... busy lives.

Between interviews for jobs, getting ready for school and an insane amount of STUFF that's just piled onto me lately, my reading has been down from 2-3 a week to ... well 0. Pathetic, right?

sigh.

I am currently finishing Hush, Hush - not sure how I feel about it. I have a predilection against characters who know anything for certain - probably because I seldom do, but we will see that ending.

Anyways, happy reading!

Thursday, August 5, 2010

46!

I am at 46 books this year! Way ahead of my goal for the year, so far (i.e. school has not started yet, after all).

And what a great journey it's been so far!

I have a few reviews coming up!

Linger and Shiver by Maggie Stiefvater; The Time of the Hunter's Moon by Victoria Holt; an Oldie but a goodie, Bad Boys to Go Anthology by Lori Foster; etc etc etc. Where to begin?

I'll let you know!

Cheers! :D

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Multiple Perspectives and Dealing with Lonliness.

When I was fourteen I was in grade nine at Loretto Abbey Catholic Secondary School - with the short blue plaid kilt, the possible hunchback sighting in the church tower and the library stocked with french books, to supplement the extended french program, given you know, Quebec. At the time, my father was finally going to get the teeth he wore on wires that had to be taken out and cleaned nightly, stuck in permanently with screws. So I went with him for the six hour operation, so I could drive him home (No, I didn't have a license, but come on - it was Richmond Hill, there was no one around).

I was in my Hugo phase at the time. I had just read Hunchback, and wanted more of that depressingly picture mixture of sadness and thought. So I read through Dumas, then latched onto the ginormous French edition of Les Mis. It was amazing - and the reason I thought (and still think) it was amazing was do to the use of multiple perspectives to etch out the idea of "loneliness".

Enter Jojo Moyes' The Peacock Emporium:


Athene Forster is the most glamorous girl of her generation. She is also beautiful, spoilt and out of control. And two years after her marriage to the steady young heir to a farming estate the rumours have begun again.Thirty-five years on, Suzanna Peacock is saddled with her dazzling mother's legacy, at odds with her father and his second wife and struggling in a stalled marriage. The only place she finds comfort is in her shop - The Peacock Emporium. There she makes the first real friends of her life, including Alejandro, who is escaping his own ghosts in Argentina...


That synopsis can be found here and it is the same that is found on the back of the book, but I think it does the book itself a disservice. It starts out confusing and slow - and the time shifts within the novel can also be challenging, but when it all comes together the reader is left with a feeling of completeness. As if the pain and loneliness and the trials were all worth it to come to the realization that life is the most it can be when lived and loved, and to hide away and be afraid of your own life, is not way to live.

My favourite character is probably the character of Vivi. Suzanna's mother but so much more - the second part of the book is told from her perspective as a chubby blonde girl in the 1960s with a crush on her best friend and a sunny very innocent personality. When that best friend overlooks her for another, she takes it all within her and moves on - but never completely does. Though she moves to London and has a new life, filled with friends and a boyfriend, she never really gets over Douglas. And hearing about his tragic life through the grapevine, Vivi becomes a shadow of herself, hanging on desperately to each scrap of news from him, but never gathering the courage to face him. For most of the book you are left wondering what happened to bring them together, and you just cannot understand ... and then when you do, you realize that all the loneliness in the world is in some way chosen. And that giving up pride and such will be worth the love in the end.

I make it sound sappy - it isn't. It's a deep and moving book that made me cry. Me, cry. Exactly. It is well thought out and it pulls no punches.

That being said, I thought the ending was rushed.

You saw it coming, then it went - there was not much to experience in between. Though that scene at the Emporium with Ale and Suzanna goes on my top Ten.

Athene herself is interesting. You spend most of the book dismissing her because she paints such an awful picture. And then right at the end, your heart bleeds for her - for the bed she made for herself. The pain and the loss of herself to circumstance. To give a spoiled brat such character is hard - but it was satisfying. The loss is even more pronounced as no one knows of her personal struggles, since she's dead and no one could ever ask her. It makes such a tragic story.

This is a short review. I may lengthen it in future.

I am up to ...40 books I think? Not bad! :D

Cheers!


Thursday, July 22, 2010

Steampunk Literary "Magnum Opus"?

def. magnum opus
n.
  1. A great work, especially a literary or artistic masterpiece.
  2. The greatest single work of an artist, writer, or composer.

[Latin : magnum, neuter of magnus, great + opus, work.]

The author of Boneshaker, Cherie Priest, has described her book as the steampunk "magnum opus" - that is, the pinnacle of great steampunk. I am not sure I agree.

Did I like the book? Oh yes.

Was it engaging and intriguing? Oh yes.

Can I wait for the second one? Maybe.

See, because it does contain all those great steam punk motifs - airships, 19th century setting, rifles, war (this one, the American Civil War), mad scientists (yes, in the plural), kick ass female characters, oh and you know, steam power - but it lacks the added umph for me to be like "Hell yes - that was steampunk awesomeness!" - even if it does have the best cover ever, and a great starting premise.

Anyways, a synopsis:

Maternal love faces formidable challenges in this stellar steampunk tale. In an alternate 1880s America, mad inventor Leviticus Blue is blamed for destroying Civil War–era Seattle. When Zeke Wilkes, Blue's son, goes into the walled wreck of a city to clear his father's name, Zeke's mother, Briar Wilkes, follows him in an airship, determined to rescue her son from the toxic gas that turns people into zombies (called rotters and described in gut-churning detail). When Briar learns that Seattle still has a mad inventor, Dr. Minnericht, who eerily resembles her dead husband, a simple rescue quickly turns into a thrilling race to save Zeke from the man who may be his father. Intelligent, exceptionally well written and showcasing a phenomenal strong female protagonist who embodies the complexities inherent in motherhood, this yarn is a must-read for the discerning steampunk fan.


That one is from Amazon.com.

Anyways, I have no problem with most of it - I just deny that it is the magnum opus of steampunk. Granted, I have - despite my long love affair with it - only read the basics, I feel this is just not explosive enough to essentially define the genre.

That having been said - I did like it. I liked the twist and turns the novel took, and I like the interactions between the characters. It is told alternatively from Briar and Zeke's POVs so you get an interesting perspective on the same characters we already encountered with one, by the other. The ending was excellent - sad but excellent.

And this new zombie crazed world - love the idea of "rotterS" - brilliant. It even scared me when the rotters were running after Briar, climbing a ladder (or trying to) to get to her! Brilliantly read!

Other things she did right was atmosphere - you feel like you're in the alternative history civil war era dystopia! You feel it! The lingo is the same, and the mettle of the people - they're int he gold starved - panhandler crazy west, after all. It is very well done.

I like the evocative imagery of the "walled city" - it's a popular theme, particularly in young adult books, but I like it for all the myriad of possible things it can be used to represent. In this case, I think it flutters around the edges of representing knowledge vs. ignorance and society vs. chaos. This book would play well to either of those themes - though with complications. After all - in this book, society is gained through the extortion of the chaos (in terms of manipulating and selling lemon juice).

Other things that were well done was the action sequences. (were the action sequences?) they were alive and jittery with fighting and running and breathlessness! I highly recommend the book just for that.

All in all - it is not a bad book. Great cover, excellent writing. Great mood and setting. Not a magnum opus.

Here are some links to some reviews and the author's website:
(As you can see - there is no shortage of interest on the internets for this book)
http://www.cheriepriest.com/
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/10/reverse-engineering-the-steampunk-novel-with-style-cherie-priest-and-boneshaker/
http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2009/09/review-boneshaker-by-cherie-priest/
http://www.librarything.com/work/8237886
http://fantasybookcritic.blogspot.com/2009/09/boneshaker-by-cherie-priest-reviewed-by.html
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/05/21/the-boneshaker-magic.html
http://www.sfsite.com/01b/bs312.htm
http://www.tor.com/blogs/2010/06/review-cherie-priests-lemgboneshakerlemg
http://thebooksmugglers.com/2010/03/steampunk-week-joint-review-boneshaker-by-cherie-priest.html

Until next time,
Cheers!